The large number of dollars in federal financial incentives to adopt electronic health records (EHRs) may end up costing healthcare organizations substantially more than that because of other uncoordinated IT mandates. The most glaring example: HIPAA transactions (ANSI 5010) must be upgraded by Jan 1, 2012, and ICD-10 coding must be used by Oct 1, 2013.
The danger is that organizations – lured by the federal money – will rush to install EHR systems by 2011 with little or no thought as to how those systems will function with their other computer systems that require major upgrades.
For many organizations and policymakers, the EHR and HIPAA initiatives remain uncoordinated, according to many healthcare IT experts. The environment is such that large and small healthcare organizations could easily become frustrated, which, in turn, could hamper both EHR and HIPAA adoption and compliance and quality. Those who lived through the initial HIPAA transformation are still smarting over the costs of simply adding an additional field into their computer record systems.
Make no mistake, the EHR and HIPAA initiatives are separate but related expansive and expensive computer system upgrades. Not surprisingly, there is substantial confusion. For example, HIPAA billing information is already used for quality purposes. So how will healthcare entities distinguish between EHR quality measurement systems from those using HIPAA billing data?
One big risk is that without proper planning and forethought, healthcare organizations may fall prey to the expected army of EHR entrepreneurs who will make promises they cannot keep.
The bottom line: Healthcare organizations cannot rely on EHR vendor assurances that the HIPAA billing component can simply be tacked on to an EHR systems. Nor can they assume that their clinical, administrative and practice management systems will work seamlessly without planning.
Just as important, these initiatives will require the involvement of HIPAA privacy and security officers because the EHR initiative and HIPAA updates will expand the amount of information collected and shared as well as create new security issues that come with any major change in electronic systems.
Moreover, while the economic stimulus package included new controls on patient data, the EHR initiative and HIPAA are not the only laws that will have an immediate effect on EHR systems. For example, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission recently issued proposals establishing a formal definition of “family histories” and new controls on the collection and use of this commonly sought information under the Genetic Nondiscrimination Information Act (GINA).
So the ultimate danger is that healthcare organizations may be thousands of dollars-wise in pursuing EHR incentives but hundreds of thousands of dollars foolish in trying to meet their other compliance and IT mandates.
To assist healthcare organizations in maximizing their investments in EHRs and other IT initiatives, Melamedia, LLC, publishers of Health Information Privacy/Security Alert, is sponsoring:
Coordinating EHR Incentives with HIPAA and Other Major HIT Initiatives
|
|||||||
|
WHO SHOULD LISTEN |
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
THE FACULTY |
|||||||
|
Stanley Nachimson,
Principal, Nachimson Advisors, is a former Senior Technical Advisor for
CMS’s Office of Electronic Standards and Services where he led the
development of HIPAA Security and Transaction Standard regulations and
interpretations |
|||||||
|
CONTINUING EDUCATION CREDITS |
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
REGISTRATION |
|||||||
To order online visit www.melamedia.com
or
|
|||||||
|
CD ORDERING |
|||||||
Download the form at
www.melamedia.com/051309.order.form.pdf |
|||||||
| Special Training Offer | |||||||
|
Pick Any 3 of
Our Most Successful & Informative Seminar Training CDs |
|||||||